Page 113 - UPthEM_Program_Final_December 2020
P. 113

UPthEM – Upskilling Pathways for Employability
                                                                                  № 2019-1-BG01-KA204-062299




               right here in California, City of Industry, where water is so precious. Renewable or recyclable
               materials are 25 % of the total, and growing rapidly. Renewable energy is 27 % of our total,
               going for 100 %. We have diverted 148 million pounds -- that's 74,000 tons -- of used carpet
               from landfills, closing the loop on material flows through reverse logistics and post-consumer
               recycling technologies that did not exist when we started 14 years ago.


               Those new cyclical technologies have contributed mightily to the fact that we have produced
               and sold 85 million square yards of climate-neutral carpet since
               2004, meaning no net contribution to global climate disruption in
               producing the carpet throughout the supply chain, from mine and
               well head clear to end-of-life reclamation -- independent third-party certified. We call it Cool
               Carpet. And it has been a powerful marketplace differentiator, increasing sales  and profits.
               Three years ago we launched carpet tile for the home, under the brand Flor, misspelled F-L-O-
               R. You can point and click today at https://www.flor.com/ and have Cool Carpet delivered to
               your front door in five days. It is practical, and pretty too.


               We reckon that we are a bit over halfway to our goal: zero impact, zero footprint. We've set
               2020 as our target year for zero, for reaching the top, the summit of Mount Sustainability. We
               call this Mission Zero. And this is perhaps the most important facet: we have found Mission
               Zero to be incredibly good for business. A better business model, a better way to bigger profits.
               Here is the business case for sustainability. From real life experience, costs are down, not up,
               reflecting some 400 million dollars of avoided costs in pursuit of zero waste -- the first face of
               Mount Sustainability. This has paid all the costs for the transformation of Interface.

               And this dispels a myth too, this false choice between the environment and the economy. Our
               products are the best they've ever been, inspired by design for sustainability, an unexpected
               wellspring of innovation. Our people are galvanized around this shared higher purpose. You
               cannot beat it for attracting the best people and bringing them together. And the goodwill of the
               marketplace is astonishing. No amount of advertising, no clever marketing campaign, at any
               price,  could  have  produced  or  created  this  much  goodwill.  Costs,  products,  people,
               marketplaces -- what else is there? It is a better business model.

               And here is our 14-year record of sales and profits. There is a dip there, from 2001 to 2003: a
               dip when our sales, over a three-year period, were down 17 percent. But the marketplace was
               down 36 percent. We literally gained market share. We might not have survived that recession
               but for the advantages of sustainability. If every business were pursuing Interface plans, would
               that solve all our problems? I don't think so. I remain troubled by the revised Ehrlich equation,
               I equals P times A divided by T2. That A is a capital A, suggesting that affluence is an end in
               itself.  But  what  if  we  reframed  Ehrlich  further?  And  what  if  we  made  A  a  lowercase  'a,'
               suggesting that it is a means to an end, and that end is happiness -- more happiness with less
               stuff.

               You know that would reframe civilization itself and our whole system of economics, if not for
               our species, then perhaps for the one that succeeds us: the sustainable species, living on a finite

                                                           110
                The European Commission support for the production of this publication [document] does not constitute an endorsement of the contents
                  which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the
                                                  information contained therein.
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118